Monday, January 16, 2012

Evangelical leaders try to unite behind Rick Santorum (The Christian Science Monitor)

Washington – In a bid to sway the South Carolina vote, national evangelical leaders, meeting at a ranch west of Houston, on Saturday rallied behind former Sen. Rick Santorum for the GOP presidential nomination.

Many came into the meeting committed to other candidates, especially former Speaker Newt Gingrich. All of the candidates, except former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, sent surrogates to make a case for support.

But in the end, evangelical leaders want to use whatever clout they have to help a strong conservative advance in South Carolina?s Jan. 21 primary, upsetting frontrunner Mitt Romney, who is viewed as too moderate ? or too Mormon.

�??There was a desire to see a true conservative emerge to secure the nomination, and the overwhelming belief was that a true conservative has the best chance of winning a direct election against Barack Obama,�?

?What?s the point if we do not get a true conservative?? he added.

Election 101: Where the GOP candidates stand on immigration, abortion and other social issues

But with so much at stake in the 2012 vote, it's not clear that either the GOP candidates or the voters are likely to defer to an 85-to-25 vote in a back room in Houston. 

?What we are seeing today is nothing like the influence we saw in the 1980s and ?90s,? says Robert Jones, who heads the Public Religion Research Institute in Washington. ?The days of kingmakers in a small room deciding the GOP nominee are over.?

�??Focus on Family laid off hundreds of people, the Crystal Cathedral is for sale, and the Moral Majority and the Christian Coalition are no more," he adds. 

South Carolina looms large for Christian conservatives, who see their failure to unite around a single candidate in 2008 ? then, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee or former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee ? as swinging the GOP nomination to Sen. John McCain, a moderate on social issues. Governor Romney is currently leading in South Carolina polls, followed by Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, Gingrich, and Santorum. 

?There is hope and expectation that, with the constituencies represented here, it will have an impact on South Carolina,? said Mr. Perkins. Christian conservatives account for 60 percent of the likely GOP primary vote in South Carolina. ?I was amazed at the unity that was here.?

At issue is how to winnow the GOP primary field, before it?s too late to stop frontrunner Romney, who is viewed as not consistent on issues such as abortion rights, which he formerly supported. There are too many social conservative candidates in the race, and they are dividing the social conservative vote, they say.

The aim of Saturday�??s meeting is to find out whether there is a viable alternative to Romney, says Richard Land, president of the ethics and religious liberty committee of the Southern Baptist Convention, in an interview on C-Span�??s Newsmakers on Friday, to be aired Jan. 15.

?Most social conservatives find Romney a more attractive candidate than they did John McCain,? he said. ?This isn?t anti-Romney, but wouldn?t it be nice to find out if a social conservative is viable both in the primary and the general election??

However, if polls show that Romney continues to be more viable in the general election campaign than a conservative alternative, than Romney will be the GOP nominee, he added. ?Do not underestimate Barack Obama?s unique ability to unite social conservatives and others around whomever he is running against in a general election.?

The Monitor's Weekly News Quiz for Jan. 9-13, 2012

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Full Metal Jacket review Bicycle Thieves review 2001: A Space Odyssey review The Great Dictator review Inglourious Basterds review

Songpier Lets Anyone Make a Music App in Minutes

Previous post

Songpier Lets Anyone Make a Music App in Minutes

Apps might be the flavor of the minute, but they’re no passing fad. If you think it’s nuts that your phone, tablet and soon car and television will run apps, just wait until your refrigerator and air conditioner get in on the action.

Every song can and should be an app. Now, it can, for free — no app designers required.

If you’re in a band (or even if you’re not but have managed to record some music) it’s now possible for you to create an app in minutes that anyone can install on their phone or tablet.

Pierlane’s Songpier, released for public beta Monday, walks even the most Luddite of drummers through the process of creating a web-based app for Apple iOS or Android. (Songpier also works with other smartphones, but was designed specifically with iOS and Android smartphones and tablets in mind.)

Songpier apps are web apps, as opposed to apps in the traditional sense of being downloaded from the iTunes or Android app stores. However, users can access these apps the same way they access other apps — by tapping a neat-looking icon on their home screens — and they feel just like regular apps. They load fast, perform responsively and include an artist’s song, pictures, events, merchandise, a link to their website and more — just about everything you would expect from a standard music app from a band.

Artists can add lyrics for their Songpier songs, and use the apps to sell records, T-shirts and other merchandise by entering simple titles and URLs.

The main exception to that rule: They’re about as easy to build as a MySpace page, and most bands are clearly capable of that.

We know this because we just made one this morning. You just enter the elements (songs, buy links, your label, description, genre, release date, influences, album art/title, background image and so on), previewing them on a mocked-up smartphone or tablet to see how the end result will look.

The resulting app works in regular or landscape mode, and you even get to upload your own app icon, to which SongPier adds the trademark rounded corners, so that it looks great on the user’s home screen — although, because the resulting app is a web app that runs within the browser, rather than a native iOS or Android app, users will have to create a bookmark on their homescreens in order to tap on the icon to launch it.

Luckily, the app instructs the user on how to do this the first time they visit your app’s web location (screenshot to the below left), but it’s not as seamless as installing the app from the iTunes or Android app store.

If the artist wants it to, a SongPier app can integrate with Facebook and Twitter so that when they enter news, pictures and tour dates, it can automatically tweet them out or post them on your Facebook wall in addition to pushing them out to whoever has the app installed, so that SongPier can act as your “post once, view everywhere” social media hub.

In case you missed it, here’s the app I made for my old side project, Planet Vegas. To view it on a mobile phone, tablet or computer, visit http://songpier.com/planet?vegas/ or scan the QR code to the right.

See? It works — and again, I made this in minutes (sorry, Mobile Roadie).

Pierlane will soon announce “a partnership with a major U.S. company” in the coming month, according to what Pierland spokesman Wolfgang Senges told Evolver.fm. He added to the mystery by suggesting that it’s not a label or Apple.

Any guesses on what this mystery company could be? Send them our way.

See Also:

The Kings Speech review Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi review Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade review Die Hard review The Great Escape review

Gingrich defends Bain criticisms in SC GOP forum (AP)

CHARLESTON, S.C. – Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich said Saturday that Republicans will err if they don't scrutinize Mitt Romney's role in a private equity firm called Bain Capital.

Gingrich, the former House speaker, said President Barack Obama will hammer away at Bain if Romney is the nominee this fall.

"I don't see how you can expect us to have a presidential campaign in which an entire sector is avoided," Gingrich said on a Fox News program that included five of the six Republican candidates. Each fielded South Carolina voters' questions for almost 20 minutes.

Many Republican and conservative leaders have rebuked Gingrich for criticizing Romney's role at Bain. The private equity firm had a mixed record of job-creation at the companies it restructured in the 1980s and `90s.

Program host Mike Huckabee, who ran for president in 2008, gently reprimanded Gingrich for citing Romney by name. The candidates appeared separately, never confronting each other. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas did not participate.

The South Carolina GOP primary is Jan. 21.

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, said he wants the federal government "out of the housing business" so the free market can work. Mortgage interest payments should remain tax-deductible, he said.

When a woman said expressions of Christian faith are under attack, Romney, a Mormon, said, "I will stand up for the ability of Americans to worship the god they choose." That would include public displays of manger scenes, menorahs and other religious symbols, he said.

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman was asked why he supports legalized abortion in cases of rape and incest if he believes life begins at conception.

"I am pro-life," Huntsman said. "I have stipulations." Exceptions for rape and incest represent "where I am. I always have been, and I hope it's good enough for you," he said.

Former Sen. Rick Santorum noted that he does not support legalized abortions in cases of rape or incest. But he supports the death penalty, he said, because it does not involve "innocent life."

Santorum acknowledged voting to raise the federal debt ceiling at least five times while in Congress. But he said he consistently worked to reduce federal spending and to make the government more efficient.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry touted his call for a 20 percent flat tax, which would eliminate many existing loopholes. He would keep the deductibility of charitable gifts, local taxes and mortgage interest payments, he said.

Perry said he would dramatically reduce federal intervention in state actions regarding labor, the environment, voting laws and other matters.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Dog Day Afternoon review Diabolique review Ratatouille review Gandhi review Star Trek review

As debate roars over Haley Barbour pardons, five released convicts vanish (The Christian Science Monitor)

Atlanta – Five prisoners pardoned and released Sunday by outgoing Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) have gone missing amid a burgeoning debate about whether the 200-plus individuals given clemency by the governor merited mercy under the state constitution.

Mr. Barbour's decision to pardon a record number of convicted Mississippians ? a controversial final act of his term-limited governorship ? has sparked shock, anger, and even fear. Family members of at least one victim say they're worried about their safety.

The mass pardon has set off a national debate about whether Barbour exceeded his executive authority or whether the pardons were an appropriate remedy to an unjust legal system.

RECOMMENDED: Five US states that use the death penalty the most

On Wednesday, circuit judge Tomie Green, after a complaint by state Attorney General Jim Hood, blocked the release of 21 of the convicts because they may not have met a public notice requirement under the state constitution. Judge Green also mandated that the five men released over the weekend report back to the state and attend a Jan. 23 hearing, but Mr. Hood said Thursday that the men can't be found.

"These convicts got out and hit the road," Hood said, according to CNN. �??This is probably going to end up in some attempt by us to have fugitive warrants issued for these people. There�??s going to be a national search for some of them.�?

The five pardoned prisoners, according to the Associated Press, are four convicted murderers ? David Gatlin, Charles Hooker, Anthony McCray, and Joseph Ozment ? and one convicted robber, Nathan Kern, who was serving a life sentence. All of them had worked as inmate trusties at the Governor's Mansion.

Barbour's actions, says University of Notre Dame law professor Jimmy Gurul�, a former federal prosecutor, exceeded accepted norms of executive power, especially by giving freedom to convicted murderers without properly notifying the victims' families.

?The symbolism of this, the message that it sends to families, is so insensitive and so insulting to the memory of these murder victims. It's mind-boggling,? says Professor Gurul�.

Others say that Barbour's pardons highlight the necessity of clemency as an executive power. Some point to Alexander Hamilton's position in The Federalist Papers where he noted that ?without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too ... cruel.?

?I'm sure the governor has seen, as the rest of us have, the increasingly unjust nature of our court system these days,? writes Mary Kate Cary, a former Barbour speechwriter, in a U.S. News & World Report op-ed. ?Is there anyone who thinks our criminal justice system isn't tough enough? Haley Barbour is a smart, humane man. He understands the need for mercy and compassion in our criminal justice system. He's done nothing wrong.?

Much of the anger stems from the fact that the public wasn't privy to Barbour's private deliberations and fact-finding in each case. ?It's very difficult to answer if Barbour went too far without more complete knowledge of these individual cases,? says John Winkle, a political science professor at Ole Miss in Oxford.

?Approximately 90 percent of these individuals were no longer in custody, and a majority of them had been out for years,? Barbour explained in a statement. ?The pardons were intended to allow them to find gainful employment or acquire professional licenses as well as hunt and vote. My decision about clemency was based upon the recommendation of the Parole Board in more than 90 percent of the cases.?

Meanwhile, incoming Gov. Phil Bryant (R) has asked lawmakers to study whether a constitutional amendment may be necessary to limit the executive branch's pardon powers in the state. ?The governor believes a constitutional amendment is the right way to address such an important issue,? Mick Bullock, Governor Bryant's spokesman, said in a statement.

Green has set a Jan. 23 hearing to determine whether Barbour's pardons were, in fact, legal. Twenty-one of those pardoned remain in custody as the state searches for the five missing ex-convicts, who, under the conditions of a Mississippi pardon, are technically no longer required to check in with the state. Unless Green makes a different finding, their criminal records are clean.

RECOMMENDED: Five US states that use the death penalty the most

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Rocky review Mary and Max review Big Fish review Magnolia review Manhattan review

Sunday, January 15, 2012

HTC Android Smartphones to Gain Specialized Apps

Previous post

HTC Android Smartphones to Gain Specialized Apps

HTC's Incredible 2 smartphone, which runs version 3.0 of the company's Sense software. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired.com

HTC Sense customers may soon be able to download apps optimized just for their handsets.

HTC announced Thursday it will soon launch the HTC OpenSense�software development kit, which aids developers in creating apps designed specifically to interact with HTC’s Sense software.

HTC Sense is the company’s custom graphical user interface, built atop the Android platform. Because HTC is competing with other manufacturers like Samsung and Sony Ericsson — all three of which ship phones using the Android platform — Sense’s custom interface serves to differentiate HTC phones from other devices.

Instead of having the stock Android interface, for example, the company’s hardware comes with HTC’s version of many common apps. On an HTC phone, Twitter is relabeled as “Peep.” Menu screens also come preloaded with things like an HTC-branded media player, and calendar and contacts apps.

“As the devices become more and more alike, manufacturers will do anything they can to differentiate themselves,” Gartner research analyst Ken Dulaney told Wired.com.

The OpenSense SDK looks promising. HTC reps say developers can create apps which utilize the stylus pen for HTC’s new Flyer tablet device, as well as the stereoscopic 3-D display. If HTC lures more developers into creating apps that interact with Sense, that means more content available specifically for HTC devices — which, in turn, gives potential customers more reasons to purchase HTC-made products.

Software developers are the lifeblood of mobile platforms. Without them, places like Apple’s App Store or the Android Market would be devoid of content. Thus it makes sense, so to speak, for smartphone manufacturers to court developers, drawing them to a specific platform.

HTC’s approach of inviting programmers to code apps for its smartphones is a stark contrast to Motorola’s relationship with developers. On the same day that HTC made its dev-friendly announcement, rival manufacturer Motorola had a few less-encouraging comments regarding the apps coming from the Android developer community.

At a technology conference Thursday, Motorola CEO Sanjay Jha deflected questions on the battery life of his company’s products, placing the blame on the apps rather than the hardware.

“For power consumption and CPU use, those apps are not tested,” said Jha, referring to Android’s “open” policy of not vetting applications submitted to its Market. Google removes apps that violate its developer distribution agreement, but no system of evaluating an app’s power efficiency exists on the Market’s side. Jha went on to say that 70 percent of Motorola’s device returns are because of applications affecting performance.

Whether or not Jha’s comments are accurate, it’s a dangerous move for a company head to pass the buck to quality issues related to apps on the Android Market. Apps, of course, provided by the developer community.

A Motorola spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Jha took the opportunity to make a plug for Motorola’s own custom graphical user interface, Motoblur. Jha said Motoblur development is advancing to the point where it can warn users how much battery a given app will use. Depending on how much power there is left on the phone, you’ll then be able to decide whether or not you want to run the app.

Two companies, with two very different approaches to drawing attention to the graphical interface, and two very different effects on developers.

On a tech blog, commenter Daniel McDermott’s opinion summed up the response to Jha: “It’s insane to think Moto would pass on the blame of their crappy skin on to other 3rd party devs when they can’t even get their own phones right.”

Mike is a Wired.com staff writer covering Google and the mobile beat. He's written on a number of different tech topics, ranging from startups to social media.
Follow @mj_isaac and @GadgetLab on Twitter.

Gran Torino review Metropolis review Gladiator review The Sting review Unforgiven review

Despite video outrage, no halt to peace talk moves (AP)

WASHINGTON – Pentagon officials worry that outrage over a video purporting to depict Marines urinating on Taliban corpses will tarnish the reputation of the entire military. Some also fear it could undermine prospects for exploratory Afghan peace talks.

After roundly condemning the Marines' alleged behavior, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and top military leaders on Thursday promised a full investigation and sought to contain the damage at home and abroad.

Panetta also said the incident could endanger the outlook for peace talks, although the Obama administration and the Taliban each voiced readiness Thursday to try peace talks while pledging to carry on the military conflict until their rival objectives are met. The separate statements by senior American and Taliban officials illustrated the improved environment for Afghan reconciliation efforts as well as the daunting task ahead.

The Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the law enforcement arm of the Navy, is heading the main inquiry, which is expected to weigh evidence of violations of the U.S. military legal code as well as the international laws of warfare. Separately, the Marine Corps is doing its own internal investigation.

By Thursday evening, the NCIS had interviewed two of the four Marines appearing in the video. At the time they were filmed urinating on the bodies, the four were members of the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marines, which fought in the southern Afghan province of Helmand for seven months before returning to their home base at Camp Lejeune, N.C., last September.

Two of the four, plus the commander of the battalion, had moved on to other assignments before the video appeared on the Internet, according to Marine Corps officials who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss an active investigation.

Even Thursday's emergence of the Internet video depicting Marines urinating on what appear to be Afghan corpses didn't seem to immediately set back movement toward exploratory negotiations with the Taliban. Asked about possible implications for peace talks, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the U.S. remained strongly committed to supporting Afghan efforts.

Panetta, however, said the incident could endanger the talks.

"The danger is that this kind of video can be misused in many ways to undermine what we are trying to do in Afghanistan and the possibility of reconciliation," Panetta said at Fort Bliss, Texas, adding it's important for the U.S. to move quickly to "send a clear signal to the world that the U.S. will not tolerate this kind of behavior and that is not what the U.S. is all about."

Before he left Washington for his troop visit to Fort Bliss, Panetta called President Hamid Karzai to promise a full investigation of the video affair and condemned the Marines' behavior as "entirely inappropriate."

As the video spread across the Internet in postings and re-postings, U.S. officials joined with Afghans in calling it shocking, deplorable, inhumane and a breach of military standards of conduct. It shows men in Marine combat gear standing in a semicircle urinating on the bodies of three men in standard Afghan clothing, one whose chest was covered in blood.

It's not certain whether the dead were Taliban fighters, civilians or someone else.

The incident will likely further hurt ties with Karzai's government and complicate negotiations over a strategic partnership arrangement meant to govern the presence of U.S. troops and advisers in Afghanistan after most international combat troops withdraw by the end of 2014.

Anti-American sentiment is already on the rise in Afghanistan, especially among Afghans who have not seen improvements to their daily lives despite billions of dollars in international aid. They also have deplored the accidental killing of civilians during NATO airstrikes and argue that foreign troops have culturally offended the Afghan people, mostly when it comes to activities involving women and the Quran, the Muslim holy book.

Pentagon officials said the criminal investigation would likely look into whether the Marines violated laws of war, which include prohibitions against photographing or mishandling bodies and detainees. It also appeared to violate the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice, which governs conduct. Thus, some or all of the four Marines could face a military court-martial or other disciplinary action.

Karzai called the video "completely inhumane." The Afghan Defense Ministry called it "shocking." And the Taliban issued a statement accusing U.S. forces of committing numerous "indignities" against the Afghan people.

Panetta said the actions depicted in the brief video were inexcusable.

"I have seen the footage, and I find the behavior depicted in it utterly deplorable. I condemn it in the strongest possible terms," Panetta's statement said. "Those found to have engaged in such conduct will be held accountable to the fullest extent."

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, said he was deeply disturbed by the video and worried that it would erode the reputation of the entire military, not just the Marine Corps.

On the streets of Afghanistan, the reaction was cool.

"If these actions continue, people will not like them (the Americans) anymore and there will be uprising against them," Mohammad Qayum, said while watching a television news story about the video that was airing in a local restaurant in Kabul.

Ahmad Naweed, a shopkeeper in Kandahar, the birthplace of the Taliban insurgency, said, "On the one hand, the Americans present themselves as friends of Afghanistan and ... they also try to have peace talks with the Taliban. So we don't know what kind of political game they are playing in Afghanistan."

___

Associated Press writers Pauline Jelinek in Washington and Deb Riechmann in Kabul contributed to this report.

Robert Burns can be reached on Twitter at http://twitter.com/robertburnsAP

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Wild Strawberries review Grave of the Fireflies review Snatch review The Sixth Sense review Annie Hall review

China, Russia Could Make U.S. Stealth Tech Obsolete

Previous post

China, Russia Could Make U.S. Stealth Tech Obsolete

It’s been a pillar of the U.S. military’s approach to high-tech warfare for decades. And now, it could be become obsolete in just a few years. Stealth technology — which today gives U.S. jets the nearly unparalleled ability to slip past hostile radar — may soon be unable to keep American aircraft cloaked. That’s the potentially startling conclusion of a new report from Barry Watts, a former member of the Pentagon’s crystal-ball-gazing Office of Net Assessment and current analyst with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington.

“The advantages of stealth … may be eroded by advances in sensors and surface-to-air missile systems, especially for manned strike platforms operating inside defended airspace,” Watts cautions in his 43-page report The Maturing Revolution in Military Affairs (.pdf), published last week.

That could come as a big shock to the U.S. Air Force, which has bet its future on radar-dodging technology, to the tune of half-a-trillion dollars over the next 30 years. The Navy, on the other hand, might have reason to say, “I told you so.”

That is, if Watts’ prediction comes true — and that’s a big “if,” the analyst admits.

“In recent years there has been speculation that ongoing advances in radar detection and tracking will, in the near future, obviate the ability of all-aspect, low-observable aircraft such as the B-2, F-22 and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, aka JSF, to survive inside denied airspace,” Watts writes, referring to America’s stealth bombers and fighter jets.

Stealth-killing advances include VHF and UHF radars being developed by Russia and China, and a “passive-detection” system devised by Czech researchers. The latter “uses radar, television, cellular phone and other available signals of opportunity reflected off stealthy aircraft to find and track them,” Watts explains.

These new detection systems could reverse a 30-year trend that has seen the U.S. Air Force gain an increasing advantage over enemy defenses. That phenomenon began with the introduction of the F-117 stealth fighter in the late 1980s, followed by the addition of the stealthy B-2 (pictured) in the ’90s and, more recently, the F-22.

So far, the Air Force has only ever fielded a few hundred stealth aircraft, requiring it to constantly upgrade some nonstealthy fighters. But the flying branch plans to purchase more than 1,700 F-35s (at more than $100 million a pop) from Lockheed Martin in coming decades, plus up to 100 new stealth bombers. In that sense, the stealth era is only now truly dawning — just as effective counter-measures are nearly ready, Watts points out.

In that sense, the Air Force’s stealth gamble could turn into very, very long odds.

Comparatively, the Navy has played it safe. At the same time the Air Force was investing its research and development dollars in stealth, the Navy has taken a different approach to defeating enemy defenses. Where the Air Force plans to slip past radars, the Navy means to jam them with electronic noisemakers or destroy them with radar-seeking missiles. That’s why the only radar-killing planes in the Pentagon inventory belong to the Navy — and why, until the forthcoming F-35C, the Navy has never bought a stealth fighter.

Nowhere is that philosophical difference more apparent than in the Pentagon’s on-again, off-again effort to develop jet-powered killer drones. The Navy’s X-47 drone, built by Northrop, is minimally stealthy. Boeing’s Phantom Ray, intended mostly for Air Force programs, is arguably as stealthy as an F-35 in certain scenarios.

There’s still a chance the Air Force’s bet on stealth could pay off, Watts writes. That largely depends on two capabilities planned for the F-35.

First, there’s “the JSF?s sensor suite and computational power,” which Watts explains “can be easily upgraded over time due to the plane?s open avionics architecture, giv[ing] the F-35 an ability to adjust its flight path in real time in response to pop-up threats, something neither the F-117 nor the B-2 have been able to do.”

Second, the F-35’s radar, a so-called “electronically scanned array,” could in theory be used to jam an enemy radar or even slip malicious software code into its control system.

Neither of these capabilities is actually a form of stealth, per se. Rather, they would complement the F-35’s ability to absorb or deflect radar waves. Described uncharitably, the Air Force has had to add nonstealthy skills to its stealth fighters, just to help them survive.

Watts doesn’t address one other way the Air Force could preserve its stealth advantage: by speeding up the development of drone aircraft — which, by virtue of their smaller size, have the potential to be much stealthier than any manned aircraft.

It’s also worth noting that America’s biggest rivals don’t doubt the continuing relevance of stealthy planes. Russia and China have both unveiled new stealth-fighter prototypes in the last two years.

The way Watts describes it, the “end of stealth” is just one of the many big changes that could occur in near-future warfare — big emphasis on “could.” “The honest answer to the question about how fundamentally war?s conduct will change ? and how soon ? remains: It depends.”

Photo: B-2 stealth bomber (U.S. Air Force)

See Also:

David Axe reports from war zones, shoots television and writes comic books.
Follow @daxe and @warisboring on Twitter.

Barry Lyndon review The Celebration review Rosemarys Baby review Kill Bill: Vol 2 review Nights of Cabiria review