Thursday, March 31, 2011

Found: Yard Sale of the Future

Found: Yard Sale of the Future

Photo: Wired

Click image for a close-up view.

Click on the image for a closer look at a yard sale from 2024. Good luck unloading those Blue-Ray discs, pal—physical media died with the PlayStation 4.

What do you think our world will look like in 10, 20, or 100 years? We need your help creating a new artifact from the future for every issue of Wired magazine. Each month, we’ll propose a scenario and ask for your prognostications. Check out the latest challenge, then sketch out your vision and upload your ideas. See other submissions and vote for your favorites.

This month’s kudos go to Steve Carll, Mike C, Christian Pena, Charles Reuben, Tony Burfield, Ric Adams, jgombarcik, A.R.Ahmad. Concept was fleshed out by Stuart Candy.

Photo: Daniel Salo; Mumbai Mommy, Ocean: Corbis; Dora & Monkey, Neytiri: Everett Collection

Snatch review The Sixth Sense review Annie Hall review The Deer Hunter review Donnie Darko review

Mo. to drop extended benefits for unemployed (AP)

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Thousands of people in Missouri who have been unemployed for more than a year soon will lose their jobless benefits, marking a significant victory for Republican fiscal hawks who are crusading against government spending.

When eligibility ends Saturday, Missouri will become the only state to voluntarily quit a federal stimulus program that offers extended benefits. Michigan, Arkansas and Florida also recently took steps to cut back on money going to the unemployed, although they targeted state benefits instead.

"We have to take a stand and say, `When is enough enough?' and send a message to the federal government, and hopefully shame them into doing the right thing and quit spending money that they don't have," said state Sen. Jim Lembke, a Republican from St. Louis.

Lembke has led a coalition of four filibustering senators who have blocked legislation necessary to reauthorize Missouri's participation in a federal program offering long-term unemployment benefits. It's been a stunning setback for a bill that had passed the Republican-led House 123-14 two months ago and had the support of GOP Senate leaders and Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon.

As a result, more than 34,000 unemployed residents in Missouri could miss out on $105 million in benefits over the next nine months. Unlike some other stimulus programs, Missouri's unclaimed money would not be redistributed by the federal government to other states. It simply would remain unspent.

At issue is a provision in the 2009 federal stimulus act that allowed residents in states with high unemployment rates to receive up to 20 additional weeks of federally funded jobless benefits after exhausting the 79 weeks authorized under other federal laws. At least three dozen states, including Missouri, enacted laws to participate.

Although their unemployment rates were high enough to qualify, seven other states — Arkansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Oklahoma and Utah — never passed laws to join in, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Maryland is now pursuing participation, but many of the other states seem content to remain out of the program. Much like his Missouri counterparts, Utah Senate President Michael Waddoups said the states need to set an example of self-sufficiency.

"Somebody has to start pulling back from the federal government somewhere," said Waddoups, a Republican from Taylorsville.

That federal backlash is particularly strong in Missouri, where voters were the first in the nation to pass a measure challenging the new federal health care mandate and where Republican senators also are holding up federal stimulus money for education.

Missouri's unemployment rate has remained above 9 percent for nearly two years. Yet it is poised to become the first state to take the additional federal unemployment money, then later voluntarily stop doing so, according to officials at the federal Labor Department and the National Employment Law Project, a New York-based advocacy group for employment rights that has been urging Missouri to remain in the program.

Several other states could have been in the same situation. But the governors of Massachusetts, Michigan and Oregon all signed laws within the past week continuing participation. Michigan's action came with catch, also cutting state jobless benefits from 26 to 20 weeks starting in 2012. The Florida House has passed a similar state benefits reduction. Arkansas' legislature this week gave final approval to a bill shaving off one week of eligibility for state jobless benefits.

In Missouri, about 10,000 people would immediately be cut off from additional jobless payments, according to the state department of labor. And extended unemployment benefits would be denied to about 24,000 additional residents who otherwise are projected to become eligible.

St. Louis resident Peter Gordon, who has been unemployed for a little over a year, is among those who could miss out. A former patient care coordinator at a hearing aid company, Gordon has been searching for jobs over the Internet but said he can't travel far because he can't afford to license his car. He fears he could eventually be evicted from his apartment.

"They can provide money for government programs to take care of the elite and rich," Gordon said. "But when it comes to a small person like me — people who are just trying to make ends meet — it seems like the rights are being taken away."

Kimberly Clark, a laid off union organizer, says her post-tax unemployment benefit of $275 a week already is consumed by her rent, utility and phone bills. She's been searching for work since November 2009, and she's only a couple of months away from needing the extended benefits that Missouri is poised to reject.

"The mentality is we're just creating a bunch of lazy people, and that is not true," said Clark, 48 of St. Louis.

The National Employment Law Project says its supporters sent 15,000 emails in a roughly 24-hour period from Tuesday to Wednesday urging Missouri senators to allow a vote on the legislation reauthorizing the extended jobless benefits.

But Sen. Brian Nieves, a Republican from Washington, Mo., who is popular among tea party activists, said he has no intention of compromising his position. "The people have been crystal clear for about the last two years in saying that they expect us to at least start the process of weaning ourselves off of the federal government," Nieves said.

___

Associated Press writers Wes Duplantier in Jefferson City, Josh Loftin in Salt Lake City, Brian Witte in Annapolis, Md., Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City, Emily Wagster Pettus in Jackson, Miss., Nomaan Merchant in Little Rock, Ark., Melinda Deslatte in Baton Rouge, La., and Matt Gouras in Helena, Mont., contributed to this report.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

The Silence of the Lambs review Toy Story 3 review Se7en review Its a Wonderful Life review Memento review

Taking Old Oil from Crankcase to Gas Tank

Previous post
Next post

Taking Old Oil from Crankcase to Gas Tank

Billions of gallons of motor oil are drained from engine crankcases each year, and only some of it is reused. Much of it is simply thrown away or burned. But that old oil could find new life as fuel for your car.

Researchers at University of Cambridge have developed a process that uses microwaves to recycle old motor oil into gasoline-like fuel for use in conventional vehicles. They claim the process has “excellent potential” for commercial use.

?Transforming used motor oil into gasoline can help solve two problems at once,? Howard Chase, professor of biochemical engineering, said in a statement. ?It provides a new use for a waste material that?s too-often disposed of improperly, with harm to the environment. In addition, it provides a supplemental fuel source for an energy-hungry world.?

Some estimates suggest 8 billion gallons of motor oil are used annually worldwide. Some is collected and re-refined into lubricating or heating oil, but there are concerns about the pollution involved in doing so. A sizable amount of that old oil is simply discarded or burned.

Pyrolysis is one promising way of reusing old oil. The oil is heated in the absence of oxygen and breaks down into a mix of gases, liquids and a small amount of solids. The gases and liquids can be chemically converted into gasoline or diesel fuel. Trouble is, current methods of heating the oil do so unevenly, so the oil is not easily converted into fuel.

Chase says his team’s method uses microwaves to overcome this problem. His team mixed the old oil with microwave-absorbent material, then heated the mixture with microwaves. The pyrolysis process converts nearly 90 percent of a waste oil sample into fuel, and it has been used to produce conventional gasoline and diesel.

?Our results indicate that a microwave-heated process shows exceptional promise as a means for recycling problematic waste oil for use as fuel,? Chase said. ?The recovery of valuable oils using this process shows advantage over traditional processes for oil recycling and suggests excellent potential for scaling the process to the commercial level.?

Chase presented his findings Tuesday at the 241st National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society in Anaheim, California.

Photo: Kendrak / Flickr

Finding Nemo review The Bourne Ultimatum review The Social Network review The Terminator review The Best Years of Our Lives review

Contrails Worse for Climate Change Than Planes' Carbon Emissions

Previous post

Contrails Worse for Climate Change Than Airplane Emissions

By John Timmer, Ars Technica

Air travel has come under fire for its potential contributions to climate change. Most people probably assume that its impact comes through carbon emissions, given that aircraft burn significant amounts of fossil fuel to stay aloft. But the carbon released by air travel remains a relatively minor part of the global output?the impact of planes results from where they burn the fuel, not the mere fact that they burn it. A study in the brand-new journal Nature Climate Change reinforces that by suggesting that the clouds currently being generated by air travel have a larger impact on the climate than the cumulative emissions of all aircraft ever flown.

That fact isn’t mentioned in the article at all, however (it’s part of a Nature press release on the paper). What the authors do consider is the fact that carbon emissions are only one of the impacts of aviation. Others include the emissions of particulates high in the atmosphere, the production of nitrogen oxides, and the direct production of clouds through contrail water vapor. Over time, these thin lines of water evolve into “contrail cirrus” clouds that lose their linear features and become indistinguishable from the real thing. Although low-altitude clouds tend to cool the plant by reflecting sunlight, high altitude clouds like cirrus have an insulating effect and actually enhance warming.

To figure out the impact of these cirrus clouds, the authors created a module for an existing climate model (the ECHAM4) that simulated the evolution of aircraft-induced cirrus clouds (they could validate some of the model’s output against satellite images of contrails). They found hotspots of these clouds over the US and Europe, as well as the North Atlantic travel corridor; smaller affects were seen in east Asia and over the northern Pacific. Over central Europe, values peaked at about 10 percent, in part because the output of the North Atlantic corridor drifted in that direction.

On their own, the aircraft-generated cirrus produces a global climate forcing of about 40 milliWatts per square meter (in contrast, the solar cycle results in changes of about a full Watt/M2). But these clouds suppressed the formation of natural cirrus clouds, which partially offset the impact of the aircraft-generated ones, reducing the figure to about 30 mW/M2. That still leaves it among the most significant contribution to the climate produced by aircraft.

Some reports (like one from UPI) have suggested we might focus on making engines that emit less water vapor, but the water is a necessary byproduct of burning hydrocarbon. We’ll almost certainly be accomplishing that as a result of rising fuel prices, and will limit carbon emissions at the same time. The nice thing is that, in contrast to the long atmospheric lifespan of CO2, if we can cause any changes in cloud formation, they’ll have an impact within a matter of days.

Image: Contrails over the southeastern U.S./NASA

Nature Climate Change, 2011. DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1068

See Also:

Strangers on a Train review It Happened One Night review High Noon review The Lion King review Kill Bill: Vol 1 review

Hercules re-invents the netbook again, launches 10-inch Linux- and A8-powered eCAFE

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feeds | Amazon PluginsHud-1

Judgment at Nuremberg review The Hustler review The Killing review The Incredibles review La Strada review

Woman Can't Close Her Eyes After Bungled Plastic Surgery (VIDEO)

And now for an eye-opening look at the dangers of plastic surgery: a New Jersey woman is suing her doctor, claiming she cannot fully close her peepers after a cosmetic procedure.

Marilyn Leisz showed CBS New York news to what extent her eyelids can touch, explaining, "That's how it is when I sleep. That's how it is 24-7, 365 days a year." She added that she fears scratching her eyes at night and that she's losing her vision. "All the favorite things I used to, like tennis, racquetball, swimming, horseback riding, bike riding, skeet shooting, gardening, I can't do those things," Leisz said.

Dr. Paul Parker's defense points out that Leisz never complained since the 2005 operation and that she was warned of the risks involved because she's gone under the knife so many times.

There's no word on how much Leisz is seeking in damages.

WATCH:


'; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });


Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feeds | Amazon PluginsHud-1

Nights of Cabiria review Patton review The Truman Show review Roman Holiday review Infernal Affairs review

Whistleblower suit filed against California nuclear plant (Reuters)

SAN DIEGO (Reuters) – A former manager at one of California's two nuclear power stations sued the facility's operators on Wednesday, claiming he was fired in retaliation for reporting safety concerns at the plant.

The suit against Southern California Edison, principal owner of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, comes a year after the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission rebuked the company for what the government called a "chilling effect" on the airing of safety concerns by employees.

In a March 2010 letter cited in the lawsuit and provided to reporters by lawyers for the plaintiff, Paul Diaz, 35, the NRC ordered Edison to address a workplace climate in which workers feared retribution for reporting safety issues.

According to the lawsuit, the NRC inquiry and letter were prompted by anonymous calls and e-mails from plant "insiders" raising concerns about "shortcuts on testing new generators, unreported safety violations, falsifying records and promoting a culture of cover-up."

The lawsuit also cited problems with chronic fatigue among workers caused by lengthy shifts and heavy overtime demands.

Edison spokesman Gil Alexander said in a written statement that the company had not yet been served with a copy of the lawsuit and does not comment on pending litigation.

"However, we can say that, by policy, SCE considers retaliation against employees who raise safety concerns a termination offense," the statement said.

Diaz filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court Wednesday, seeking unspecified damages. The complaint names Southern California Edison and his former supervisor.

The San Onofre plant sits on the Pacific coast near the border of San Diego and Orange counties, about 60 miles southeast of Los Angeles. The two reactors there went into commercial operation in the 1980s.

The state's only other nuclear power plant in operation is the Diablo Canyon facility, owned by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, near San Luis Obispo on the central California coast.

Diaz was first hired at San Onofre in 1999 as a security officer and later promoted into management, his lawsuit says. He left San Onofre in 2008 to work for a northern California company, then was recruited back to the plant in 2010.

His return preceded the NRC letter by a few months, his attorney, Maria Severin, told Reuters.

"Some employees came to him with issues they were afraid to bring up because they feared retaliation," Severin said. "So he brought them up. They (his supervisors) told him: don't be a superhero."

Diaz, then manager of business and accounting and project service, was fired in October 2010, his complaint states. The ostensible reason for his dismissal was poor performance, but the lawsuit does not give specifics.

(Editing by Steve Gorman and Peter Bohan)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

The Matrix review Psycho review The Usual Suspects review The Silence of the Lambs review Toy Story 3 review

Previous post

All in the Family: Darpa Chief Owed $250,000 by Darpa Contractor

The Pentagon’s premier research arm isn’t just giving six-figure contracts to a company owned in part by agency director Regina Dugan and her relatives. Turns out the Dugan family firm owes the Darpa chief a quarter-million dollars, too.

Financial ethics records obtained by Danger Room raise the uncomfortable possibility that Darpa money could ultimately wind up in the pocket of its director. And that introduces at least the possibility of the appearance of a conflict of interest at the very top of the legendary Defense Department science-and-technology division.

A Darpa representative insists that Dugan did nothing wrong. But Nick Schwellenbach, director of investigations at the Project on Government Oversight, says that “Dugan should have known better. She should have divested herself from her financial interest in this company.”

Dugan filed a financial report on June 15, 2010, stating that she was owed $250,000 by RedXDefense, an explosives-detection company she co-founded with her father. This “note/loan” had “no schedule of payment or guarantee of repayment.” Six months before Dugan made the official disclosure, Darpa awarded RedXDefense a research contract worth $400,000.

On the form, filed with the Office of Government Ethics, Dugan also notes that she claims between $100,001 and $250,000 in “assets and income” from RedXDefense. The company’s CEO is her father, Vince Dugan, and her Uncle John is on its board.

When she became Darpa director in July 2009, Dugan declared at least $15,000 in stock assets from RedXDefense — a stake first reported by Danger Room earlier this month. Dugan recused herself at the time from all business dealings involving the agency and the company. “Effective immediately, I am disqualified from participating personally and substantially” from “any particular matter” that would impact RedXDefense?s bottom line, she noted on a government form.

“At no time did Dr. Dugan participate in any dealings between the agency and RedXDefense related to the contract,” Darpa spokesman Eric Mazzacone told us March 7.

But Dugan didn’t have to personally steer research grants towards her old firm in order to impact RedXDefense’s standing within the agency. It was (and is) common knowledge at Darpa that RedXDefense is Dugan’s family business. The company relied, in many ways, on the explosives-detection investigations she spearheaded in her previous stint at the agency, during the 1990s.

“I find it hard to believe that the program managers at Darpa would not know that their boss formerly headed this company and that her family members work there,” Schwellenbach says. “If I was a Darpa employee, I wouldn’t want to be in a position of depriving my boss’ family members of a large contract.”

Darpa spokesman Mazzacone says RedXDefense was turned down by the agency many times. “Your readers might be interested in knowing that between 2005 and July 2009, before Dr. Dugan became director of Darpa, RedXDefense proposed and was competitively awarded a total of $4,257,539,” he says. “Since July of 2009, the company submitted proposals totaling $6,524,000 to Darpa [of which] $1,750,000 was competitively awarded and $4,774,000 was rejected.”

A federal database of government contractors lists RedXDefense’s revenues as substantially lower. And a substantial portion of the money it does get is from Darpa.

The database currently lists RedXDefense’s annual intake at $1,756,214, meaning 23 percent of its cash comes from contracts with the agency run by its co-founder. RedXDefense’s contracts with non-Darpa government agencies are for substantially smaller amounts.

“If the company goes under or it doesn’t win new contracts, it can’t pay her back,” Schwellenbach says. “It basically increases her stake in the company, with the loan.” By not divesting her holdings in RedXDefense, he adds, “it certainly looks worse and worse for her.”

Mazzacone notes that Dugan’s bio on Darpa’s website contains her history with RedXDefense. “Her past association with the company is transparent,” he says. “Part of the reason government ethics regulations are in place is so that qualified people are attracted to government service, and qualified organizations are neither favored nor disfavored.”

Photo: Virginia Tech

The Lion King review Kill Bill: Vol 1 review Platoon review Into the Wild review There Will Be Blood review

New cracks in Gadhafi regime as minister defects (AP)

AJDABIYA, Libya – Moammar Gadhafi's ground forces recaptured a strategic oil town Wednesday and moved within striking distance of another major eastern city, nearly reversing the gains rebels made since international airstrikes began. Rebels pleaded for more help, while a U.S. official said government forces are making themselves harder to target by using civilian "battle wagons" with makeshift armaments instead of tanks.

Western powers kept up the pressure to force Gadhafi out with new airstrikes in other parts of Libya, hints that they may arm the opposition and intense negotiations behind the scenes to find a country to give haven to Libya's leader of more than 40 years.

Also on Wednesday, an American official and former U.S. intelligence officer told The Associated Press that CIA operatives were sent to Libya this month after the agency's station in the capital was forced to close. CIA officers also assisted in rescuing one of two crew members of an F-15E Strike Eagle that crashed, they said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.

Even as it advanced militarily, Gadhafi's regime suffered a blow to its inner circle with the apparent defection of Foreign Minister Moussa Koussa. Koussa flew from Tunisia to an airport outside London and announced he was resigning from his post, according to a statement from the British government.

Moussa Ibrahim, a Libyan government spokesman in Tripoli, denied that the foreign minister has defected saying he was in London on a "diplomatic mission."

It was not immediately possible to confirm either statement with Moussa or people close to him.

Gadhafi's justice and interior ministers resigned shortly after the uprising began last month, but Koussa would be the first high-profile resignation since the international air campaign began.

Airstrikes have neutralized Gadhafi's air force and pounded his army, but his ground forces remain far better armed, trained and organized than the opposition.

The shift in momentum back to the government's side is hardening a U.S. view that the poorly equipped opposition is probably incapable of prevailing without decisive Western intervention — either an all-out U.S.-led military assault on regime forces or a decision to arm the rebels.

In Washington, congressional Republicans and Democrats peppered senior administration officials with questions about how long the U.S. will be involved in Libya, the operation's costs and whether foreign countries will arm the rebels.

NATO is taking over control of the airstrikes, which began as a U.S.-led operation. Diplomats said they have given approval for the NATO operation's commander, Canadian Gen. Charles Bouchard, to announce a handover Thursday.

Intelligence experts said the CIA operatives that were sent to Libya would have made contact with the opposition and assessed the rebel forces' strength and needs if Obama decided to arm them.

The New York Times reported that the CIA had sent in small groups of CIA operatives and that British operatives were directing airstrikes.

Gadhafi's forces have adopted a new tactic in light of the pounding that airstrikes have given their tanks and armored vehicles, a senior U.S. intelligence official said. They've left some of those weapons behind in favor of a "gaggle" of "battle wagons": minivans, sedans and SUVs fitted with weapons, said the official, who spoke anonymously in order to discuss sensitive U.S. intelligence on the condition and capabilities of rebel and regime forces. Rebel fighters also said Gadhafi's troops were increasingly using civilian vehicles in battle.

The change not only makes it harder to distinguish Gadhafi's forces from the rebels, it also requires less logistical support, the official said.

The official said airstrikes have degraded Gadhafi's forces since they were launched March 19, but the regime forces still outmatch those of the opposition "by far," and few members of Gadhafi's military have defected lately.

The disparity was obvious as government forces pushed back rebels about 100 miles (160 kilometers) in just two days. The rebels had been closing in on the strategic city of Sirte, Gadhafi's hometown and a bastion of support for the longtime leader, but under heavy shelling they retreated from Bin Jawwad on Tuesday and from the oil port of Ras Lanouf on Wednesday.

Gadhafi's forces were shelling Brega, another important oil city east of Ras Lanouf. East of the city in Ajdabiya, where many rebels had regrouped, Col. Abdullah Hadi said he expected the loyalists to enter Brega by Wednesday night.

"I ask NATO for just one aircraft to push them back. All we need is air cover and we could do this. They should be helping us," Hadi said.

The battlefield setbacks are hardening a U.S. view that the opposition is probably incapable of prevailing without decisive Western intervention, a senior U.S. intelligence official told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Obama's director of national intelligence, James Clapper, compared the rebel forces to a "pick-up basketball team."

Gadhafi's forces also have laid land mines in the eastern outskirts of Adjabiya, an area they held from March 17 until Saturday, when airstrikes drove them west, according to Human Rights Watch.

The New York-based group cited the electricity director for eastern Libya, Abdal Minam al-Shanti, who said two anti-personnel mines detonated when a truck ran over them, but no one was hurt. Al-Shanti said a civil defense team found and disarmed more than 50 mines in what Human Rights Watch described as a heavily traveled area.

NATO planes flew over the zone where the heaviest fighting was under way earlier Wednesday and an Associated Press reporter at the scene heard explosions, but it was unclear whether any airstrikes hit the area. U.S. Marine Corps Capt. Clint Gebke, a spokesman for the NATO operation aboard the USS Mount Whitney, said he could not confirm any specific strikes but that Western aircraft were engaging pro-Gadhafi forces in areas including Sirte and Misrata, the rebels' last significant holdout in western Libya.

The retreat Wednesday looked like a mad scramble: Pickup trucks, with mattresses and boxes tied on, driving east at 100 mph (160 kilometers per hour).

And as the fighting approached Ajdabiya, residents there made an exodus of their own. The road to the rebels' de-facto capital, Benghazi, was packed with vehicles, most of them full of families and their belongings. Streets on the western side of Ajdabiya were deserted and silent.

Rebel military spokesman Col. Ahmed Bani said the rebels had made a "tactical retreat" to Ajdabiya and will set up defensive positions there. "Even with courage and determination, the forces need power to be able to fight back," he said.

Bani said he heard from three sources, including one in Chad, that 3,200 to 3,600 heavily armed members of the Chadian presidential guard were marching from Sirte toward Ajdabiya. The report could not be independently confirmed.

As Gadhafi's forces push rebels toward Benghazi, some 140 miles (220 kilometers) northeast of Brega, pressure is growing for NATO members and other supporters of the air campaign to do more.

Prime Minister David Cameron said Britain believes a legal loophole could allow nations to supply weapons to Libya's rebels — but stressed the U.K. has not decided whether it will offer assistance to the rebels.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Tuesday that Washington also believes it would be legal to give the rebels weapons.

"No decision has been made about providing arms to the opposition or to any groups in Libya," said White House press secretary Jay Carney. "We're not ruling it out or ruling it in."

NATO officials and diplomats said the alliance had not considered arming the rebels. Any alliance involvement would require support from all 28 members, a difficult task, and an alliance official who could not be named under standing regulations said NATO "wouldn't even consider doing anything else" without a new U.N. resolution.

China, Russia and Germany oppose supplying weapons to the rebels.

Under the U.N. resolution authorizing necessary measures to protect civilians, nations supplying weapons would need to be satisfied they would be used only to defend civilians — not to take the offensive to Gadhafi's forces.

Chinese President Hu Jintao said the operation already had gone too far. He called for an immediate cease-fire and admonished French President Nicolas Sarkozy at a diplomatic meeting in Beijing. Hu called for peaceful efforts to restore stability, expressed China's concern that Libya may end up divided and said force would complicate a negotiated settlement.

Diplomats were attempting to persuade Gadhafi to leave without military force.

Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said negotiations on securing Gadhafi's exit were being conducted with "absolute discretion" and that there were options on the table that hadn't yet been formalized.

"What is indispensable is that there be countries that are willing to welcome Gadhafi and his family, obviously to end this situation which otherwise could go on for some time," he said. But the Italian diplomat insisted immunity for Gadhafi was not an option.

Uganda became the first country to publicly offer Gadhafi refuge. The spokesman for Uganda's president, Tamale Mirundi, told the AP on Wednesday that he would be welcome there.

Gadhafi has shown no public sign he might leave power, vowing to fight until the end. His forces were continuing to besiege Misrata, the rebels' main western holdout.

An activist in Misrata said there have been power outages, and water service was cut off so residents must rely on wells, but the biggest problem was a lack of medical supplies such as anesthesia and sterilizers, along with diapers and baby formula. Four people in the town were killed Tuesday, the activist said.

Libyan officials took journalists to the home of a family who said their 18-month-old son was killed in an airstrike Tuesday morning against an ammunition dump in the mountain village of Khorum, 55 miles (90 kilometers) south of Tripoli. They say their home was hit by a stray missile when the dump was hit. Their account could not be independently confirmed.

British and other diplomats were involved in negotiations with the rebel leadership in Benghazi. Cameron's spokesman Steve Field said it was partly to gauge if the opposition would be trustworthy allies — "learning more about their intentions."

NATO's top commander, U.S. Navy Adm. James Stavridis, has said officials have seen "flickers" of possible al-Qaida and Hezbollah involvement with the rebel forces. Bani, the rebel military spokesman, dismissed accusations that al-Qaida elements are fighting with the rebels.

"If there are elements that were with al-Qaida in the past and they are now in Libya, they are now fighting for Libya, not for al-Qaida," he said, emphasizing the word "if."

___

Associated Press writers Ben Hubbard in Benghazi, Hadeel al-Shalchi in Tripoli, Robert Burns in Washington, David Stringer in London, Slobodan Lekic in Brussels, Angela Charlton in Paris, Godfrey Olukya in Kampala, Uganda, and Christopher Bodeen in Beijing contributed to this report.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Fight Club review Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope review Goodfellas review Casablanca review City of God review

Logitec's new wireless router is crazy-looking, crazy fast

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feeds | Amazon PluginsHud-1

In Bruges review True Grit review A Streetcar Named Desire review Stalag 17 review The Exorcist review

China military policy paper lays out worries about U.S. (Reuters)

BEIJING (Reuters) – China said on Thursday it faced an increasingly "volatile" Asian region where the United States has expanded its strategic footprint, maintaining that better military ties between Beijing and Washington rested on respect for each other's interests.

China's People's Liberation Army spelled out its concerns about U.S. intentions in a policy paper setting out broad priorities for Beijing's growing military forces.

The "white paper" said that while China wants to avoid military confrontation and focus on growing its economy, it sees potential security challenges across the region, many of them bound up with Washington's web of alliances and military forces across Asia, including on the tense Korean peninsula.

"Profound changes are taking shape in the Asia-Pacific strategic landscape. Relevant major powers are increasing their strategic investment," said China's defense white paper for 2010 which, despite its date, was released only on Thursday.

"The United States is reinforcing its regional military alliances and increasing its involvement in regional security affairs," it said. "Suspicion about China, interference and countering moves against China from the outside are on the increase."

U.S. weapons sales continue to Taiwan, the self-ruled island that Beijing claims as an illegitimate breakaway province, hampering the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, the paper added.

It also singled out the Korean peninsula and Afghanistan as sources of worry.

"Asia-Pacific security is becoming more intricate and volatile," the paper said. "International military competition remains fierce."

Last year, Beijing and Washington wrangled over North Korea, a long-time ally of China, which ignited regional alarm by torpedoing a South Korean navy ship, killing 46 sailors, and later shelling a South Korean island, killing four people.

North Korea denied downing the ship, and China refused to join other countries in condemning Pyongyang over that or the November shelling of the island. Instead, Beijing chided the United States for holding joint military exercises with South Korea in seas across from China's coast.

"RESPECT" PLEASE

But a PLA officer, Geng Yansheng, said Beijing nonetheless wants better military ties with Washington, and that a senior Chinese commander, the PLA Chief of General Staff Chen Bingde, would visit the United States in May, following on from U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates' visit to Beijing in January.

"Healthy and stable military ties is important for both sides in striving to build a China-U.S. cooperative partnership based on mutual respect and mutual benefit," Senior Colonel Geng, who is a spokesman for China's Defense Ministry, told a news conference to introduce the white paper.

Gates' visit and then a Washington summit between Presidents Barack Obama and Hu Jintao marked an easing of tensions between the two big powers after a string of disputes in 2010, including Chinese anger over the U.S. arms transfers to Taiwan.

But Geng indicated that China's concerns about Taiwan and other issues that it calls "core" strategic interests have not eased altogether.

"There remain some difficulties and challenges in China-U.S. military relations," he said, adding that defusing them required, "in particular, respecting each other's core interests and major security concerns."

China says its defense white papers are intended to ease concerns abroad about where the country's military modernization is headed. The last such document was released in 2009.

But neither the paper nor the accompanying news conference shed much light on what China intends to do with its growing military budget. Geng did not directly answer questions about whether the PLA Navy intends to launch the country's first aircraft carrier as a stepping stone to a bigger ocean presence.

Chinese military and political sources say Beijing could launch its first aircraft carrier in 2011, a year earlier than U.S. military analysts had expected.

Earlier this month, China unveiled a 12.7 percent rise in its 2011 defense budget, in a return to double-digit spending increases that have stirred regional unease.

The 2011 defense budget is 601.1 billion yuan, up from 532.1 billion yuan last year. The budget went up by just 7.5 percent in 2010, after a long period of double-digit hikes.

Many experts believe China's actual spending on the 2.3 million-strong People's Liberation Army (PLA) is far higher than what the government reports.

China, now the world's second-largest economy, often points out that its defense spending pales in comparison with the United States and that its military upgrades are for defensive purposes.

The Pentagon in February rolled out a record base budget for fiscal year 2012 of $553 billion, up $22 billion from the level enacted for 2010.

(Additional reporting by Sally Huang, Chris Buckley and Sui-Lee Wee; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly review The Wild Bunch review In Bruges review True Grit review A Streetcar Named Desire review

Exclusive: Obama authorizes secret help for Libya rebels (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing covert U.S. government support for rebel forces seeking to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, government officials told Reuters on Wednesday.

Obama signed the order, known as a presidential "finding", within the last two or three weeks, according to four U.S. government sources familiar with the matter.

Such findings are a principal form of presidential directive used to authorize secret operations by the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA and the White House declined immediate comment.

News that Obama had given the authorization surfaced as the President and other U.S. and allied officials spoke openly about the possibility of sending arms supplies to Gaddafi's opponents, who are fighting better-equipped government forces.

The United States is part of a coalition, with NATO members and some Arab states, which is conducting air strikes on Libyan government forces under a U.N. mandate aimed at protecting civilians opposing Gaddafi.

In interviews with American TV networks on Tuesday, Obama said the objective was for Gaddafi to "ultimately step down" from power. He spoke of applying "steady pressure, not only militarily but also through these other means" to force Gaddafi out.

Obama said the U.S. had not ruled out providing military hardware to rebels. "It's fair to say that if we wanted to get weapons into Libya, we probably could. We're looking at all our options at this point," the President told ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer.

U.S. officials monitoring events in Libya say that at present, neither Gaddafi's forces nor the rebels, who have asked the West for heavy weapons, appear able to make decisive gains.

While U.S. and allied airstrikes have seriously damaged Gaddafi's military forces and disrupted his chain of command, officials say, rebel forces remain disorganized and unable to take full advantage of western military support.

SPECIFIC OPERATIONS

People familiar with U.S. intelligence procedures said that Presidential covert action "findings" are normally crafted to provide broad authorization for a range of potential U.S. government actions to support a particular covert objective.

In order for specific operations to be carried out under the provisions of such a broad authorization -- for example the delivery of cash or weapons to anti-Gaddafi forces -- the White House also would have to give additional "permission" allowing such activities to proceed.

Former officials say these follow-up authorizations are known in the intelligence world as "'Mother may I' findings."

In 2009 Obama gave a similar authorization for the expansion of covert U.S. counter-terrorism actions by the CIA in Yemen. The White House does not normally confirm such orders have been issued.

Because U.S. and allied intelligence agencies still have many questions about the identities and leadership of anti-Gaddafi forces, any covert U.S. activities are likely to proceed cautiously until more information about the rebels can be collected and analyzed, officials said.

"The whole issue on (providing rebels with) training and equipment requires knowing who the rebels are," said Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA Middle East expert who has advised the Obama White House.

Riedel said that helping the rebels to organize themselves and training them how use weapons effectively would be more urgent then shipping them arms.

According to an article speculating on possible U.S. covert actions in Libya published early in March on the website of the Voice of America, the U.S. government's broadcasting service, a covert action is "any U.S. government effort to change the economic, military, or political situation overseas in a hidden way."

ARMS SUPPLIES

The article, by VOA intelligence correspondent Gary Thomas, said covert action "can encompass many things, including propaganda, covert funding, electoral manipulation, arming and training insurgents, and even encouraging a coup."

U.S. officials also have said that Saudi Arabia and Qatar, whose leaders despise Gaddafi, have indicated a willingness to supply Libyan rebels with weapons.

Members of Congress have expressed anxiety about U.S. government activities in Libya. Some have recalled that weapons provided by the U.S. and Saudis to mujahedeen fighting Soviet occupation forces in Afghanistan in the 1980s later ended up in the hands of anti-American militants.

There are fears that the same thing could happen in Libya unless the U.S. is sure who it is dealing with. The chairman of the House intelligence committee, Rep. Mike Rogers, said on Wednesday he opposed supplying arms to the Libyan rebels fighting Gaddafi "at this time."

"We need to understand more about the opposition before I would support passing out guns and advanced weapons to them," Rogers said in a statement.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by David Storey)

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

The Hustler review The Killing review The Incredibles review La Strada review Good Will Hunting review

Congressional negotiations resume on spending bill (AP)

WASHINGTON – Renewed House-Senate budget negotiations aimed at averting a government shutdown center on possibly cutting $33 billion from current spending levels, a senior congressional aide said Wednesday. Democrats pressed to ease GOP cuts to domestic agency budgets by slowing Pentagon growth and trimming so-called mandatory programs whose budgets run on autopilot.

The $33 billion figure is well below the $60 billion-plus in cuts passed by the House last month but also represents significant movement by Senate Democrats originally backing a freeze at current rates. Tea party-backed GOP stalwarts want more, and it's unclear whether they could live with the midway arrangement between top Democrats and Speaker John Boehner.

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said "there's no agreement on a number for the spending cuts. Nothing is agreed to until everything is agreed to."

He said any agreement on spending is dependent on resolution of numerous policy provisions.

The talks are occurring between the members and staff of the House and Senate appropriations committees, who understand the details of the legislation better than the leadership offices that have been doing most of the negotiations so far. Because of the sensitivity of the situation, aides required anonymity to confirm the talks.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said on the Senate floor, "I'm glad (Boehner) has returned to the conversation."

Publicly, the Ohio Republican and his colleagues are still calling for the Democratic-led Senate to pass its own version of the bill, and Boehner himself says the talks are going so haltingly that he doesn't know the shape of any final legislation that President Barack Obama might sign.

"The Senate says, `We have a plan.' Well great. Pass the damn thing, all right?" Boehner said. "Send it over here and lets have real negotiations, instead of sitting over there and rooting for a government shutdown."

At issue is must-do legislation to bankroll the day-to-day operating budgets of federal agencies — including military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan — through the Sept. 30 end of the budget year. Other major tests will soon follow, as House Republicans unveil a blueprint to attack the broader budget mess next week and a must-do measure to maintain the government's ability to borrow money to meet its responsibilities.

Last month, House Republicans passed a measure cutting more than $60 billion from the $1.1 trillion budgeted for such programs last year. All the savings were taken from domestic programs and foreign aid, which make up about half of the pot. Democrats in the Senate killed the measure as too extreme, citing cuts to education, health research, food inspection and other programs and services.

They also strenuously oppose many GOP policy measures catching a ride on the legislation, including a provision to effectively block implementation of Obama's signature health care reform law. Social conservatives also strongly back provisions to cut off money for Planned Parenthood clinics that provide abortions in addition to the family planning services the government funds.

Other controversial policy prescriptions would block the Environmental Protection Agency from carrying out regulations on greenhouse gases and implementing a plan to clean up the Chesapeake Bay and prohibit the government from shutting down mountaintop mines it believes will cause too much water pollution.

In a gesture aimed at winning the ongoing public relations battle, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said the GOP-controlled House would take up legislation on Friday that would automatically enact their original measure unless the Senate steps up and passes a yearlong spending bill by next Friday's midnight shutdown deadline. Cantor said the idea is to prod the Senate to act, but the measure won't go any farther in the Democratic-led Senate than did the original GOP measure.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Finding Nemo review The Bourne Ultimatum review The Social Network review The Terminator review The Best Years of Our Lives review

Microsoft Co-Founder Allen Blasts Gates in New Memoir

Previous post

Microsoft Co-Founder Paul Allen Blasts Bill Gates in New Memoir

There can only be one.

That’s the impression one gets reading the eyebrow-raising new charges leveled by billionaire Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen against his childhood friend and former business partner, Bill Gates.

In an incendiary new book, Idea Man, excerpted by Vanity Fair Wednesday, Allen accuses Gates of “scheming to rip me off,” by trying to dilute Allen’s stake in the software pioneer.

“It was mercenary opportunism, plain and simple,” Allen writes. Later, after Gates rebuffed Allen’s request to increase his stake, Allen says that, “In that moment, something died for me.”

Bill Gates is known as a relentless — some might even say ferocious — competitor, so it’s not altogether surprising that he angled to take control of Microsoft, which dominated the desktop-software market for nearly two decades.

But Allen’s candid appraisal of his relationship with the man he thought he had a 50-50 agreement with shines new light on the intrigue at the highest levels of Microsoft as it grew to become a corporate giant.

If true, Allen’s account would upend key pillars of the conventional wisdom regarding Microsoft’s history. Many people believed that Allen’s growing distance from the company was prompted in large part by his battle with Hodgkin’s Disease in 1982, as The Journal notes.

But Allen writes that he felt alienated from Gates, due to the latter’s hard-driving and combative personal style.

“My sinking morale sapped my enthusiasm for my work, which in turn could precipitate Bill’s next attack,” Allen writes, according The Wall Street Journal, which also writes Wednesday of the memoir.

“I had helped start the company and was still an active member of management, though limited by my illness, and now my partner and my colleague were scheming to rip me off,” Allen writes. “It was mercenary opportunism, plain and simple.”

It’s not clear what Allen’s motivations were in writing the new book. With an estimated net worth north of $10 billion, he certainly doesn’t need the money.

A spokesperson for the Portfolio imprint of Penguin Group USA, which is publishing the book on April 19th, said Allen would not be doing interviews prior to that date.

At the end of the day, this is about the dirty laundry of two giant egos. However, it is important from an historical perspective, and if Allen is really as aggrieved as he sounds, than it’s not surprising that he feels the need to set the record straight. Or that he would choose to do so with a publish date that is a mere 15 days after the 36th anniversary of the founding of Microsoft.

Allen’s book is not, however, the final record of the history of Microsoft. It will be up to future — impartial — historians to fashion a more complete picture, and try to separate fact from fiction and faulty memory.

Photo: Bill Gates, left, chats with Portland Trail Blazers owner and� former business partner, Paul Allen, during a game between the Blazers and Seattle SuperSonics in Seattle, in this March 11, 2003, file photo. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, file)

See Also:

Sam Gustin is a New York-based Staff Writer at Wired.com.
Follow @samgustin on Twitter.

The Usual Suspects review The Silence of the Lambs review Toy Story 3 review Se7en review Its a Wonderful Life review

Blow for Kadhafi as foreign minister defects (AFP)

AJDABIYA, Libya (AFP) – Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi suffered a major blow with the defection of his foreign minister even as his forces again proved too strong for the rebels' rag-tag army.

Kadhafi's forces overran the towns of Ras Lanuf, Uqayla and Brega, rebels reported, scattering the outgunned insurgents as world powers mulled arming the fighters to help them oust the Libyan strongman.

But these reverses were perhaps offset when Foreign Minister Mussa Kussa became the most senior figure to defect from the Kadhafi regime since the uprising against his iron-clad 42-year rule erupted more than six weeks ago.

"We can confirm that Mussa Kussa arrived at Farnborough Airport on 30 March from Tunisia," the British foreign ministry said. "He travelled here under his own free will. He has told us that he is resigning his post."

The New York Times, meanwhile, reported that the United States and Britain had inserted covert intelligence agents into Libya to make contact with rebels and to gather data to guide coalition air strikes.

The White House refused to comment on the apparent shadow war and also declined to discuss another report that President Barack Obama had signed a secret order allowing Central Intelligence Agency operations in the country.

A senior US official did, however, welcome the defection of Kussa, interpreting his flight as a sign that Kadhafi's inner circle was beginning to crumble.

"This is a very significant defection and an indication that people around Kadhafi think the writing's on the wall," the source said.

Militarily, though, it was another terrible day for the rebels as superior firepower from Kadhafi's forces saw them driven back 200 kilometres (125 miles), giving up most of the ground their recent advances had secured.

AFP reporters and rebel fighters said Kadhafi's troops swept through the oil town of Ras Lanuf, 300 kilometres (185 miles) east of Kadhafi's hometown Sirte, soon after dawn, blazing away with tanks and heavy artillery fire.

But later, an air strike about 10 kilometres (6.5 miles) west of Ajdabiya, where rebels are sheltering, sent a huge plume of smoke rising into the sky and brought cries of jubilation from the rebel fighters, who had been calling for renewed air support.

"We want two things: that the planes drop bombs on Kadhafi's tanks and heavy artillery; and that they (the West) give us weapons so we can fight," rebel fighter Yunes Abdelghaim told AFP.

The 27-year-old, who was holding a Russian AK-47 assault rifle and French flag, said it seemed as if the coalition had halted its air strikes for two days coinciding with a London conference on the Libyan crisis.

By nightfall, the town of Brega, which also has an oil refinery, was in the hands of loyalists, rebels said, and the sound of artillery fire could be heard on the outskirts of Ajdabiya.

Explosions shook an eastern suburb of Tripoli overnight as warplanes staged a raid on the Libyan capital, a witness told AFP by telephone.

NATO began to take command of Libyan air operations from a US-led coalition as warplanes and other assets from several allies came under the military organisation's control.

"This is a phased process, which will be completed as soon as all allies and partners have transferred authority for their assets," NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu told AFP.

As the insurgents were being routed, British Prime Minister David Cameron said in London that the option of arming the rebellion had not been ruled out, putting him more in line with Obama and the Americans.

Asked in parliament what Britain's policy was on arming the rebels, given the existence of a United Nations arms embargo on Libya, Cameron replied: "We do not rule it out but we have not taken the decision to do so."

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe had set the tone at the London conference when he said on Tuesday that France was prepared to hold discussions on delivering arms to the rebels.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said however Moscow believed that foreign powers did not have the right to do so under the mandate approved by the UN Security Council.

And in Beijing, China's President Hu Jintao warned French President Nicolas Sarkozy that air strikes on Libya could violate the "original intention" of the UN resolution authorising them if civilians suffer.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that although UN sanctions prohibit the delivery of arms to Libya, the ban no longer applies.

"It is our interpretation that (UN Security Council resolution) 1973 amended or overrode the absolute prohibition on arms to anyone in Libya, so that there could be a legitimate transfer of arms if a country should choose to do that," she said.

A spokesman for the rebel Transitional National Council, Mustafa Ghuriani, told reporters "it would be naive to think we are not arming ourselves" to match the weaponry deployed by Kadhafi loyalists.

But he declined to confirm or deny that France and the United States were offering to supply arms, saying only that unspecified "friendly nations" were backing the rebels.

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

Some Like It Hot review The Bridge on the River Kwai review Rashomon review Once Upon a Time in America review Amadeus review

Elite Forecasters Help Powderhounds Chase Snow

Previous post

Elite Forecasters Help Powderhounds Chase Snow

For most people, weather forecasts are in the background. We want to know what the drive to work is going to be like, or whether it?ll rain this weekend. For others, weather is vitally important, like farmers who rely on detailed forecasts to know when to plant and harvest crops,

But some use weather specifically to forecast fun. Surfers have long used a network of websites like Surfline.com to tell them when weather and swells combine for the best waves.

Now, skiers and snowboarders have increasingly been able to get in the game with an array of tools to help them decide not just where to go skiing, but when, thanks to a small but growing group of niche weather forecasters offering custom reports tailored to winter sports enthusiasts.

That?s never more important than at the end of the season, when moist, increasingly warm air is colliding with arctic cold fronts, producing some of the largest and most spectacular powder days of the season, like the week-long series of storms that dumped 82 inches of powder (almost seven feet) on Tahoe?s Heavenly over a recent six-day stretch. If you know, you know where to go.

Joel Gratz started Colorado Powder Forecast in 2008 as an e-mail list. Once it grew to over 500 subscribers, he put it online. Just over a year ago, he quit his job to run coloradopowderforecast.com full-time and, for this season, he?s seen over 100,000 unique users visit his site ?on no advertising,? he told Wired.com. (He does use social media, with a presence on both Facebook and Twitter.)

Gratz, who has a meteorology degree from Penn State University, says that the site marries his two passions: weather and skiing. (He?s logged about 70 days on snow this year, he estimates.) And in weather forecasts for skiers, he saw an unserved niche that not only required a more sophisticated understanding of weather, but a greater use for more specific information.

?Weather and snow have been my passions since I was a kid,? Gratz said. ?Skiing is a captive audience. There are these very small windows of perfect weather — in our case, a big dump of powder. Skiers are highly weather sensitive. Even if they can?t rearrange their schedule around when snow falls, they want to know what will happen so they know where they can find the best snow.?

The granddaddy of powder forecasters is Snowforecast.com. Founder Chris Manly started the site in 1998 and now serves most regions in the country with a small posse of equally committed forecasters.

For many, it?s a calling. Gratz built a weather station at age 11. Manly, trained in the military, was reading atmospheric physics books while everyone else was taking smoke breaks: ?You really have to love what you do to get up early in the morning to put all this together.”

Why do we need powder-specific forecasts? Both men said snowfall can be highly variable, and small differences in topography, like whether a ski area is west-facing (and gets the benefit of orographic lifting, like Steamboat), can have huge impacts on snow totals.

But beyond that, the public face of weather forecasting hasn?t changed much in 40 years. ?There?s a massive gap between what meteorologists know and what they communicate to the general public,? Gratz said. ?There have been some accuracy advances but the communication part of it mostly centers on fancy graphics.?

(To underscore this, one of Gratz?s principal tools is a network of backcountry weather stations called SNOTEL, that date to the 1970s.)

As well, mainstream forecasters are trying to serve such a broad viewership that the size of that audience alone prevents them from offering detailed information to specific groups. That?s where Gratz and Manly step in.

Colorado Powder Forecast breaks down storm totals not just by ski area and day of the week, but also time of day. Did the snow fall during the daytime, and when it?s likely to get tracked in? Or did it fall after the lifts close, which makes for a fresh — and far more desirable — blanket of untracked powder to hit the next morning? An easy-to-read format offers best powder days at each area.

But are niche forecasters any more accurate than the mainstream guys? In one repsect, the answer is intrinsically yes. Instead of merely forecasting a 30-percent chance of precipitation for a huge swath of an area — in which some places might get a dusting and others a foot — Gratz and Manly offer detailed point forecasts that make use of the data they say meteorologists have but don?t tell the public about.

And that their audience is more discerning makes for higher stakes. ?The National Weather Service guys are more life-and-limb,” Manly said. ?We don?t have to worry about that, but we do have to fine-tune snowfall estimations more than they do. They don?t lose viewers if they don?t nail the totals.?

Gratz tracks his accuracy with a Keep Me Honest page, which looks at how closely his forecasts have predicted actual snowfall. So far for this 2010-11 ski season, he?s claimed the most accurate forecast in 11 of Colorado?s 21 major storms this season.

That might not sound stellar but it’s, by his count, much more accurate than the next-best alternative, the National Weather Service, which has been tops in six of the 21 storms.

The Weather Channel? None, so far.

Frontpage thumbnail photo: Flickr/apostolosp, CC

Trainspotting review Gone with the Wind review The Gold Rush review Scarface review The Grapes of Wrath review